Poco X3 NFC Review

Last update : 17/1/2024

- Introduction -
- Physical features -
- Audio -
- Display -
- Bootloader unlocking -
- Repairability -
- Custom ROM & Kernel Availability -
- Other issues -
- Conclusion -

Introduction

The Poco X3 NFC - the last Xiaomi / Poco device I'll probably want to take, if I'm not counting the X3P (which I already obtained).

Summary : X3P without the performance to fully utilize its 120hz display in games. Maybe there's the extra battery life... but then again the X3P's already good enough so the X3N's pointless at best.

Physical features

The X3(N/P) is a bulky & thicc device (compared to most device I've used) with the best grip a big-handed being like me could ever ask - with or without a case (though I'd prefer having a case, if only for that giant camera bump).

Screen protector observations :

Audio Quality

The X3N has a bottom loudspeaker + earpiece / top speaker stereo combo & a headphone jack.

The speaker quality is very good - the top speaker competes with the bottom speaker well enough that it doesn't feel drowned out, but it'll also vibrate the back, which you'll feel the most when the X3N's not covered with a case.

The headphone jack quality is passable. Loudness wise, it squarely falls into "average" territory... though somewhat louder than the X3P in my personal anecdote.

Display

The 6.67 inch 20:9 120hz LCD with a centered punch hole is pretty good, even though it's barely usable out in the sunlight at max brightness. Sure, that centered hole sucks (and it leaves a visible shadow around it), but that smooth 120hz screen somewhat makes up for it - no amount of smoothness will make up for a hole in the middle of the screen, unfortunately. But still, it's a nice panel, with decently uniform backlighting aside from the shadow caused by the camera hole.

One thing to note about the X3(N/P)'s display is that it lacks adaptive refresh rate by default, which means it won't randomly adjust the refresh rate on usage unless the feature is added into the ROM you're running.

Bootloader unlocking

No changes from the F1 (except for wait time, though that's on Xiaomi), so it's still the worst bootloader unlock protocol, no questions asked. You need a Xiaomi account, have to submit your phone number to Xiaomi servers, and use a proprietary Windows-only application to unlock its bootloader. That, combined with 168 real-world hours (maybe even more, up to 2 weeks at worst - and yes, it's longer than the F1, as far as I can remember) of wait time (which gets triggered somewhere around the unlocker app as far as I remember), makes it the worst.

munchy's bootloader unlock video for Poco F1

Repairability

In terms of repairability, the X3N (and X3P by hardware similarities) are in line with most regular glass-backed phones, if slightly easier due to the plastic back.

Teardown references (for X3P, which also applies for X3N) :

Custom ROM & Kernel Availability (as of 18/12/2023)

In terms of custom ROMs, the X3N is less than ideal, but still workable enough.

For custom recoveries, I'd personally recommend brigudav's TWRP as it mounts partitions as RW by default. Ardjlon & rxuglr offers unofficial PBRP & SHRP Reborn respectively, but I can't say whether they mount partitions as RW by default as I haven't used either.

For flashable custom kernels, there's only Deluxe Kernel (with inbuilt setup wizard for optional KernelSU support) at this point, with separate builds for A11/A12L & A13 (unified builds for A11-A14 since 21/12/2023 build). Everything else is no longer developed.

Other issues

Generally, there's not much problems with the X3N, aside from:

As for avoidable problems, we got :

Conclusion

The X3N is basically a F1 that trades performance for better build, display, battery, & audio (and add NFC if you don't get the Indian variant). That's it. In my opinion, the Indian X3 (karna) is probably (ignoring the random bricking potential) better since it has a bigger battery capacity, even though you pay for it with an even thicker body (by 0.7mm) & removed NFC.

That said, the X3N has nothing to offer against X3P under direct comparison. Sure, brigudav's TWRP allows mounting partitions as rw (by default and/or inbuilt script), but the X3P can do that too, though with terminal commands. Development does not compare favorably, putting even less reason for me to recommend the X3N. Combined with the hard-bricking issue present on both, I don't recommend getting the X3N.

Back to top

Index - cellphone

Main Page